Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Tools
-Getting Started
-Policies
-Formatting Tips
-Public Schools
-Classifieds
-Dedham News
-E-mail Us


Social Media

 Subscribe in a reader

--Twitter accounts--
--@myDedham--
--@DedhamHistory--

--Twitter lists--
--Dedhamites on Twitter--
--Dedham Organizations--
--Dedham Businesses--

Links
Official Links
  • Town's Website
  • Town Charter
  • Assessor's database
  • CodeRED
  • Commission on Disability
  • Public Schools
  • -Norfolk Aggie
  • -Blue Hills
  • Public Library
  • Police
  • Water District
    Community Groups
  • DHS Alumni
  • DHS Alumni on LinkedIn
  • Choral Society
  • Civic Pride
  • Community House
  • Cub Scouts
  • Education Foundation
  • Educational Partnership
  • Food Pantry
  • Friends of the Library
  • Historical Society
  • Horse Thieves Society
  • Fairbanks House
  • Food Pantry
  • Junior Women's Club
  • Moose
  • Mother Brook Community Group
  • Museum of Bad Art
  • Retired Mens Club
  • Rotary Club
  • Square Circle
    Government
  • US Sen. Kerry
  • US Sen. Brown
  • US Rep. Lynch
  • MA Sen. Walsh
  • MA Rep. McMurtry
  • Town Administrator
  • --TA's Weekly Updates
  • Town Boards
  • Town Clerk
  • Cultural Council
    Local Sports
  • Youth Baseball
  • Youth Hockey
  • Pop Warner
  • Youth Soccer
  • Softball
  • Lacrosse
  • Girls Basketball
  • CYO Basketball
    Dedham News
  • Your Town - Dedham
  • Dedham Transcript
  • Google News
    Churches
  • Adventist
  • Allin Congregational UCC
  • Calvary Baptist
  • First Church UU
  • Fellowship Bible
  • Good Shepard Episcopal
  • St John's Orthodox
  • St. Luke's Lutheran
  • St. Mary's Catholic
  • St. Mary's LifeTeen
  • St. Paul's Episcopal
  • St. Susanna's Catholic
    Other
  • Blogs
  • --Dedham Rocks
  • --Dedham Tales
  • Books
  • The Box Office
  • Dedham Pottery
  • Public Television
  • Real Estate Blog
  • Universal Hub
  • Videos
  • Wikipedia

  • Search




    Advanced Search


    Brian Keaney

    Scooped!

    by: Brian

    Sun Jan 18, 2009 at 12:54:31 PM EST


    As a Dedham Mirror alumnus, I still try and pick up a copy whenever I can.  As a Dedham High alumnus I still have an interest in what's going on at the school, and reading the student newspaper is one of the best ways to keep up to date.  They will even sometimes report stories that slip through the cracks of the established press but are still of interest to the wider community, like when MTV came to town or when the High School adopted a new mascot.

    On Friday, they did it again.  Twice.  The most recent issue of the Mirror has two stories about contract negotiations with the teachers' unions.  I sent out a Twitter alert on January 7th saying


    Rumor mill abuzz:Teachers narrowly rejected a contract offer last night. Many reportedly not pleased with Union President Tim Dwyer.

    I got enough for a "tweet."  The Mirror got enough for a front page story confirming the vote and that it was was "extremely close."  According to the Mirror, the contract would offer a 1% raise for this year, a 2% raise for next year, and a 2% raise the following year with an additional 1% raise halfway through.  The sticking point, or at least one of them, seems to be that elementary school teachers would be required to "host conferences" for an additional 2 hours outside school hours next year and then again for 2 more hours the year after that.  

    Congratulations to Sarah Mosca and the entire Dedham Mirror staff for scooping the professional Dedham press, myself included.  The second scoop they got wasn't a news article, but a column on the Opinion page.  Dedham Education Association Tim Dwyer penned a piece that was largely about the mechanics of labor unions and contract negotiations - with a little propaganda thrown in - but it was well done and appropriate for a high school audience.  It isn't until the bottom third that it really gets interesting for those of us on the outside.

    Brian :: Scooped!
    In it, Dwyer writes:

    Teachers are still writing letters of recommendation and providing extra help.  The difference now is that most of this work must occur during the contract time.  This action comes as a shock to some students and parents.  Yet, I would suggest that what "work to rule" shows people is just how much extra teachers do during normal times.  None of us would go to our auto mechanic and demand that he or she stay open late, or come as early as we find convenient.  But many students have grown so accustomed to Dedham teachers being there well after or before they have to be there that they think it is part of the job.  It isn't.

    He closes by asking students to be patient and supportive until an agreement can be reached on a new contract.

    Finally, students might want to enlist the support of myDedham's very own suzanne.  There is a box on the Opinion page (started when I was an editor, so I'm glad to see it continued) called Roses and Thorns.  They are like quick hits where they give a rose to something they like, and thorns to things they don't.  The top thorn in this issue is the "lack of shoveling in the pool parking lot and sidewalk."  Students who drive themselves must park at the pool and walk down Mt. Vernon St to get to school.

    The editorial cartoon by Mike Mucciaccio has a pensive looking boy walking in the street as he crosses the old railroad bridge to get to school.  Not only is the sidewalk not shoveled, there is a snowman built on it.  A thought bubble comes out of his head saying, "I hope I don't get hit by a plow."  

    It took a little agitation on suzanne's part, but she was able to get the sidewalks she walks down shoveled.  This is one lesson students should study up on extra hard.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email

    | More
    Scooped! | 24 comments
    Not About the Money (0.00 / 0)
    It is nice to read that the issue that kept the contract from passing was not about the money.  The teachers seem to realize the state of the economy and of the town.  It is amusing that the school committee would, however, offer so little, yet want a requirement for "more hours" from one set of the teaching staff (elementary).  It seems that this may be the wrong time for either side to ask for more.  As I understand it, elementary teachers already meet at least twice a year with every parent.  These conferences already occur, so why is the s.c. looking for more?

    teachers contract (0.00 / 0)

    I don't have children in the elementary school system,however, are you saying that teachers are no longer providing parent teacher conferences at night?
    So that means that parents must take time off from their work to attend these meetings  during the day.
    How many parents complained about that I wonder? Could that be the reason the school committee is asking the teachers to take 2 hours a year to host a conference after school time?
    Teachers have enough time off with their scheduled  teachers meetings etc..... they should be more accomodating to the elementary school parents.

    clarification (4.00 / 1)
    ....scheduled meetings (usually professional development or curriculum work) does not equal time off.
    I had to attend my son's elementary conference during my work hours which, although difficult, I made it work.  Although most school systems to have a system of offereing parents some conferences during the day and some either later afternoon/evening.  My guess is there is more than meets the eye and it is not all about 2 hours.

    [ Parent ]
    but... (0.00 / 0)
    This is not necessarily directed at you, Brightonborn, as I realize you do not have children in the primary schools.   Elementary teachers spend an extended time on conferences since they are much more informative than a report card at that age.  Also, most teachers are parents as well, so you want them to leave their children (with childcare costs!) to meet for a few minutes in the evening?  I have children in the upper grades, and the 20 minute to half hour conferences I received at the elementary school level are infinitely more informative that the 4 minute meet-and-greets we receive at high school parent's nights.

    Remember, one's child is NOT an inconvenience to one's job...one's job is an inconvenience to one's child. People should be honored to take time from their schedule to invest in the education of their children. As Mr. Dwyer wrote in his opinion piece, "None of us would go to our auto mechanic and demand that he or she stay open late, or come as early as we find convenient."


    [ Parent ]
    Professionals (0.00 / 0)
    "None of us would go to our auto mechanic and demand that he or she stay open late, or come as early as we find convenient."

    I would, however, value the service of the auto mechanic who would provide such flexibility, and give him/her my business, repeatedly.

    As a salaried professional, I understand the expectation that extra hours are required at inconvenient times. Most teachers believe the same thing. However, they are in a unusual position, as they are salaried professionals who are under union contract.  Therefore, they need to balance their understanding of what constitutes a professional responsibility with their obligation to the greater body of professionals to which they belong ... and when the two conflict, there is often static.  


    Professional responsibility (0.00 / 1)
    In my skimming of the Mirror, I missed another article related to the contract negotiations.  Rani Aljondi, the editorial editor, also wrote a column in which he takes teachers to task for working to rule.  He goes beyond saying teachers have a professional responsibility and that they are "morally obliged [to] help after school."

    I must ask the question - how does depriving the students attack an administration? ...  I asked this question last time - and demand an answer - why must the student body hang that your cause in the contract negotiations may dine?

    Teachers have few cards they can play, but I have to agree with Rani that I don't like this one at all.  It isn't fair to punish the students.

    myDedham.org - a community since 1636 and online since 2007!


    [ Parent ]
    So... (0.00 / 0)
    So what you are saying is that this tactic works and that the administration had better step up to rectify it.  How does one "punish the students" by doing one's job?  If anyone decided not to do what was contractually obligated, THAT would be a punishment and unfair to the teachers.

    And if teachers are "morally obliged" to help after school, would it not follow that students and parents are "morally obliged" to do what they can to help?  For instance, how about the parents who take students on vacations during the school year?  My child had a classmate who missed two weeks of school.  Are the teachers "morally responsible" to help that child catch up upon returning?


    [ Parent ]
    work to rule (0.00 / 0)
    I assume that there is a typo in the last sentence of your first paragraph.  Should it read, "...THAT would be a punishment and unfair to the students"?

    That being said, I agree with much of what you've written here.  Brian mentioned that teachers have very few cards they can play.  By doing just what is contractually obligated of them for a relatively short period of time should serve as an eye opener to the administration and school committee.  Out of so called "moral obligation", teachers already go way above and beyond what they are compensated for, and most people don't realize that until this "extra" is taken away.  Complaints and concerns should be directed toward admin. and s.c. to resolve this.  

    To be completely transparent, I must admit that my daughter is a teacher in a system south of Boston that has had similar contract troubles in recent years, so I may be a bit biased by her experiences...


    [ Parent ]
    Above and Beyond (0.00 / 0)
    Both of my parents were teachers, and neither of them entered the teaching profession believing that their contractual obligations described their duties. They were there to teach children, and they knew from Day One that the school day did not end at the final bell. It's not "extra" stuff, it's part of the profession.  

    Perhaps priests should unionize, that way they would only have to perform last rites if people are dying during contractually agreed upon hours.


    Don't compare a teacher to a mechanic! (0.00 / 0)
    The teachers are paid a salary.  I am a mechanic and get paid hourly.  I make less than the teachers and certainly do not get the summers off. If I work Saturdays with overtime them I probably make more than a teacher.  The manager of our shop is salary, If he were to work to rule(a 40 hour week) he would most definitely be fired). I would not want his job.  
    If the teachers want to be hourly, they should be paid that way, with three weeks off, no summers off, and be paid overtime for the extra time they put in.
    If they want to be paid a salary, then they should be willing to put in the extra time that salaried professionals must put in to be successful.  
    If the want to be paid more, they should fight for a raise based on comparable school systems prevailing salary, not because they put in a few extra hours at night that almost every teacher in my 40 years experience has put in...Furthermore the administration should be able to repolace teachers who work to rule and there should also be a program in place to reward exceptional teachers who put in the extra effort....  

    OK, because they are different . . . (0.00 / 0)

    and it's mpre difficult to teach than to do many other jobs

    I remember seeing one of my kid's 6th grade teachers in Dedham bring a class of 23 kids to order,  explain the assignment, break the kids up into smaller groups, spend a few minutes with EVERY child, bring the class back together, teach the whole class using a combintion of the kids observations and her own, then  stop, all in 42 minutes

    she as earning right at the lowest grade in Dedham at the time ~ $33k/year . . and she worked hard for her money

    when teachers work to rule that's a union negotiating tactic and a reminder that they normally do much more than what is required by contract, which means that, as curveguy says, they normally "put in the extra time that salaried professionals must put in to be successful."

    That's what teachers do year in and year out . . . and "work-to-rule" proves that's so!


    [ Parent ]
    Work to Rule (0.00 / 0)
    My child is at one of the Dedham Elementary Schools. Last fall, just a few days prior to the school's Open House, which is held at night, I received a notice from my child's teacher informing parents of her students that she would not be at the Open House because it was the same night as her child's school open house in another town.  Parents were still able to visit her classroom, but she would not be there. As the kids had been in school for less than a month, it was the first opportunity for many parents to meet the teacher who is spending 6 hours a day with their child.

    The teacher offered to meet with parents the day of the OH, either before school started in the morning ("if there wasn't any traffic and she got there on time" she wrote)between 8-8:30 or afterschool, from 3-3:30. I was extremely disappointed as were other parents, some of whom had already taken the evening off from work or had hired a babysitter (no children, including the student, were allowed at the OH)to go.  So that this teacher didn't have to miss her own daughter's OH, she inconvenienced 19 families who had to make alternate plans to meet her.  I called the principal of the school to express my disappointment. She was careful not to be critical but said she was also disappointed. When I asked if the principal had any authority to make the teachers attend the OH, I was told no, that teachers were operating on a 'work to rule' and that she had no foot to stand on.  If there was a contract, the teacher would be made to attend the OH.

    Now I happen to like my child's teacher and think she does a great job, but because of this incident, my first impression of her was not very positive.  Perhaps she was trying to make a point to the administration. Whether it worked, I don't know. What I do know, is that she frustrated many parents by intentionally missing the OH, demonstrating that she would rather inconvenience 19 families rather than just her own if she had to find another time to visit with her child's teacher.

    My point is this - I know that (most) teachers work very hard, put in A LOT of extra hours outside of the classroom correcting papers, prepping lesson plans, etc. I know many also spend their own money for classroom supplies (disclaimer - there are several teachers in my extended family). I just wish there was another way for them to make a statement to the administration without it having a direct impact on their students.  


    i'll help them if they help me (0.00 / 0)
    i know it's a holiday and all, but that didn't prevent every street, including my little dead end lane, from getting plowed, but the bridge was not shoveled on either side. sigh...
    as for the students, of course they have a right to walk safely. the bit about the snowman on the bridge is good; maybe i'll do that tonight on my way home from work at midnight.
    greener days in general day are coming, and that will mean more use of public transport, more biking, and more walking, so the standards for safe winter travel simply must include more than just cars.  

    ...to worship the god who laughs.

    Adopt a Site (0.00 / 0)
    I have seen many sites around town that have been adopted by local businesses who beautify the area by planting flowers, etc.in the good weather.  It's too bad the same concept couldn't be applied in the winter time as well by clearing these problem areas.  Perhaps even youth groups could get involved.    

    good idea (0.00 / 0)
    actually, craig, i've thought about that sort of thing myself. what bugs me about it, though, is the idea that drivers can safely assume that their streets will get cleared, while paying the same taxes as non-drivers, who have to go begging for their essential services, and then guess whether or not they'll actually get what's been promised. voluntary service can mean less than reliable service. it's time for us to start thinking of bikers and walkers as valuable citizens and encourage their habits to spread. for a green economy, we're worth our weight in gold!

    ...to worship the god who laughs.

    Westwood and Wellesley (0.00 / 0)
    Via their town blogs, we learn that Wellesley and Westwood and forming committees to make those communities more pedestrian/ bike friendly.

    myDedham.org - a community since 1636 and online since 2007!

    [ Parent ]
    great links (0.00 / 0)
    thanks brian; this is exactly the direction dedham should be moving. as the nation and the world realizes that a green economy is good for the bottom line, so must towns and neighborhoods. have you heard anything else about the bridge/pedestrian question regarding the high school? anything you think i (or we) can do?

    ...to worship the god who laughs.

    Besides pick up a shovel? (0.00 / 0)
    I haven't heard anything more, though when I drove by yesterday I did see kids walking in the street.  No snowman on the sidewalk, though.

    You seem to be pretty good at getting town officials to shovel the sidewalks.  All I can recommend is calling the high school and suggesting that they shovel it.  The number to the main office is 326-4773 and the superintendent is 326-5622

    myDedham.org - a community since 1636 and online since 2007!


    [ Parent ]
    sidewalks (0.00 / 0)
    I'm surprised they haven't put sidewalks up on Elm St/Rustrcraft Road.  So many pedestrians could walk along that street to and from the train or Legacy Place and not have to worry about getting hit by a car!

    [ Parent ]
    Accident waiting to happen (0.00 / 0)
    Pedestrians walk that road every night in the pitch dark...That, along with the cars that are idling next to the train station, make for a very dangerous situation.

    [ Parent ]
    you would think (0.00 / 0)
    legacy place would build sidewalks. maybe they will but that road has been so poorly planned. As for the train and idling cars, etc. How come nobody plowed the area so cars could pull in? Let me guess because it's state not town, right? It's really dumb not to plow that area for pedestrians and cars for drop/pick ups.

    [ Parent ]
    Not a parking lot. (0.00 / 0)
    I think the reason it was not plowed is because it is technically the side of the road. It is not a parking lot or a designated pick-up area.

    It was my understanding that the access from the train station to Elm/Rustcraft was the product of some sort of agreement between the builders of Jefferson Station and the MBTA. It would therefore be under their jurisdiction and they should be the ones to designate it whatever it needs to be designated so it gets taken care of and pedestrians are not in danger. IMHO they should also be responsible for putting lights on Elm/Rustcraft. If you are going to allow people access to the train station from that location you need to provide for their safety.

    But, again, I think it falls into the category of one of those things that is so often done without too much forethought and planning. The builders of Jefferson Station have no motivation to implement safety procedures and the MBTA doesn't even shovel the sidewalks of the lots it owns and makes $$$ off of why would we expect they would plow property they don't make any $$$ on?

    Seems that doing what is right so often gets pushed aside for doing just what is minimally required....


    [ Parent ]
    thanks (0.00 / 0)
    thanks, brian; i'll look into next week. have people been looking at the wbztv site? pedestrian access is one of the hottest topics there right now. re. the comments about who should be clearing what space for what use: if a space is being used for a purpose, it should either be cleared for safe use or, if it's not intended for that use, that fact should be clearly signed and access prevented, and whatever community the space is in should either clear it or arrange for the responsible party to do so. in other words, such questions should not be used as excuses to endanger people.

    ...to worship the god who laughs.

    accident waiting to happen (0.00 / 0)

    I travel rustcraft rd. at the time of day when people are returning home from work and  shudder everytime I see those people trying to navigate that  area in total darkness and no freakin sidewalks for their protection.
    I thought between the town and the MBTA and the developers of that project that something was supposed to be done about the dangerous conditions that exist there.
    I hope an accident doesn't occur but if it did I would be running to an attorney to bring suit against all parties responsible for the outrageous conditions that exist there.

    Scooped! | 24 comments

    HOME

    All content © 2010
    The Contentment Company

    Creative Commons License


    Event Calendar
    September 2010
    (view month)
    S M T W R F S
    * * * 01 02 03 04
    05 06 07 08 09 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 * *
    << (add event) >>

    Poll
    Legacy Place has been around for a year now. How do you like it?
    Great! I go there all the time.
    Good. I'm glad we have it, but I don't go often.
    It's OK. Doesn't affect me one way or another.
    Bad. It's been a net-negative for the town.
    Terrible! I wish they never built it.

    Results

    Active Users
    Currently 1 user(s) logged on.


    Powered by: SoapBlox