Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Tools
-Getting Started
-Policies
-Formatting Tips
-Public Schools
-Classifieds
-Dedham News
-E-mail Us


Social Media

 Subscribe in a reader

--Twitter accounts--
--@myDedham--
--@DedhamHistory--

--Twitter lists--
--Dedhamites on Twitter--
--Dedham Organizations--
--Dedham Businesses--

Links
Official Links
  • Town's Website
  • Town Charter
  • Assessor's database
  • CodeRED
  • Commission on Disability
  • Public Schools
  • -Norfolk Aggie
  • -Blue Hills
  • Public Library
  • Police
  • Water District
    Community Groups
  • DHS Alumni
  • DHS Alumni on LinkedIn
  • Choral Society
  • Civic Pride
  • Community House
  • Cub Scouts
  • Education Foundation
  • Educational Partnership
  • Food Pantry
  • Friends of the Library
  • Historical Society
  • Horse Thieves Society
  • Fairbanks House
  • Food Pantry
  • Junior Women's Club
  • Moose
  • Mother Brook Community Group
  • Museum of Bad Art
  • Retired Mens Club
  • Rotary Club
  • Square Circle
    Government
  • US Sen. Kerry
  • US Sen. Brown
  • US Rep. Lynch
  • MA Sen. Walsh
  • MA Rep. McMurtry
  • Town Administrator
  • --TA's Weekly Updates
  • Town Boards
  • Town Clerk
  • Cultural Council
    Local Sports
  • Youth Baseball
  • Youth Hockey
  • Pop Warner
  • Youth Soccer
  • Softball
  • Lacrosse
  • Girls Basketball
  • CYO Basketball
    Dedham News
  • Your Town - Dedham
  • Dedham Transcript
  • Google News
    Churches
  • Adventist
  • Allin Congregational UCC
  • Calvary Baptist
  • First Church UU
  • Fellowship Bible
  • Good Shepard Episcopal
  • St John's Orthodox
  • St. Luke's Lutheran
  • St. Mary's Catholic
  • St. Mary's LifeTeen
  • St. Paul's Episcopal
  • St. Susanna's Catholic
    Other
  • Blogs
  • --Dedham Rocks
  • --Dedham Tales
  • Books
  • The Box Office
  • Dedham Pottery
  • Public Television
  • Real Estate Blog
  • Universal Hub
  • Videos
  • Wikipedia

  • Search




    Advanced Search


    Brian Keaney

    Remember tutor issue when voting.

    by: kathy

    Wed Apr 08, 2009 at 19:24:03 PM EDT


    (Whatever you take with you into the polls, don't forget to vote on Saturday. - promoted by Brian)

    I have held my opinion far too long waiting for the "elected" official to make a public apology.  Since she will not and the school committee opts for explaining their silence in last week's letter to the editor as a "confidentiality issue" I take exception to the handling of this issue.

    Far too much emphasis is being placed on it being a confidentiality issue and not on whether or not services were provided to the other students during this teacher's absence. It was also mentioned in the past that it "was only a prep period and one 45 minute block", which I want to stress the importance of this teacher having a prep period, for it is this time frame in which she follows up with the students other teachers to see where the students are having difficulty in and sets her class teachings to reinforce  those issues.  The 45 minute period she missed, was a teaching class, so both of these classes are important to the student who is having difficulty in regular classrooms.   Does anyone know or has anyone questioned whether or not any grades were affected during the time frame the teacher was out tutoring this student?  I can assure you they were.

    kathy :: Remember tutor issue when voting.
    I also want to make it clear that when a student qualifies for out of school tutor placement, the special education department uses teachers from the DPS to tutor these students.  When asked if a child could be tutored during regular school hours, a friend was told that, no, that is not available as the tutors work at the schools during regular school hours so they only are available after school hours. She was unhappy with this, but, that was the policy.  Now, because her child was tutored after school, from 3-5pm, and she had to be in the home while the tutoring was there, she now had to ask friends to pick up her elementary school children from school, because she could not leave the house, and if her child had any after school activities, she had to ask other parents to bring them to it.  So, would she have preferred to have her child tutored before 3pm, you bet yah!  Do I think this elected official misused her authority to make her life easier?  You bet yah!   I want you all to think about this coming election, and when voting for your school committee members, remember that you want this person to "look at the big picture", see every student as if they were their own, that they should be looking out for  all students of the Dedham Public School, not just her own.  Please think about who you want to represent your children on the School Committee the next three years and vote accordingly this Saturday.
    Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
    Print Friendly View Send As Email

    | More
    Exactly (0.00 / 0)
    I do not care who was involved or the child involved. What this is, is a Superintendent either being at a minmum unethical and at a maximum illegal.

    Did she intimidate non tenured teachers to get this service provided? Is she promoting unethical/illegal principals to our youth or the teachers under her employ?

    The school committee has never made her answer these allegations and the problem continues to fester.

    So I will vote in with the new and on Saturday go with Kevin and Joe and leave the third spot blank as I have zero confidence in the current committee.  


    Confidentiality (0.00 / 0)
    Stebivule, that sounds like a breach of confidentiality.  The kind that the school committee is holding so dear.  The right to privacy should also extend to kathy's friend.

    [ Parent ]
    Tutoring (0.00 / 0)
    Please clarify what your friend's child required - tutoring or in-home instruction.  It's a HUGE difference:

    TUTORING is extra help for a child who attends a full school day but is struggling and may require additional assistance due to a disability.  Tutoring is done after school hours.

    IN-HOME SERVICES are provided by the school for a child who is unable to attend school and requires instruction in the home setting.  In-home services are typcially provided on a short-term basis during school hours.

    My guess is that your friend's child qualified for tutoring, and that's why it occurred after school.  The other child was receiving temporary in-home services, which is why it happened during the school day.

    If that is the case, then you have written an inflammatory and potentially damaging post that states the following unfounded conclusion:

    Do I think this elected official misused her authority to make her life easier?  You bet yah!

    Frankly, if I'm right, I think you should retract this portion of your post and stick with the facts.


    Not so clear cut (0.00 / 0)
    In one of my first letters, I asked June Doe if there was anyone "that teaches, tutors, or provides another service to a child or children in their home."  For whatever reason, her response did not make the clear distinction that you do:

    When a student is unable to attend school for an appreciable period of time because of a physical or psychological problem, or if a special education student's individual education plan so provides, the school department can and does provide tutoring or other services in the child's home or, at times, at some other site, such as the public library, which is arranged between the service provider and the family.  For ease of reference, despite the fact that sometimes these services involve activities other than tutoring, I will refer to all of these services as "home tutoring" in the balance of this letter.


    myDedham.org - a community since 1636 and online since 2007!

    [ Parent ]
    Thanks for the clarification (0.00 / 0)
    The distinctions do get messy, and frankly, June's use of the term "tutoring" only further muddies the water in this case.

    [ Parent ]
    I know the difference.. (0.00 / 0)
    I am quite aware of the difference between "after school" help and in home tutoring. This child was serviced because she/he was not able to attend regular school during the day.    

    Great, thanks (0.00 / 0)
    Well that's it then. Your use of the term "tutoring" was what threw me.

    Just curious, without revealing any personal information, why was your friend's child unable to attend school?


    [ Parent ]
    Confidentiality (0.00 / 0)
    Stebivule, that sounds like a breach of confidentiality.  The kind that the school committee is holding so dear.  The right to privacy should also extend to kathy's friend.

    [ Parent ]
    I think... (0.00 / 0)
    ... that was part of my point.

    [ Parent ]
    What didfference does it make? (0.00 / 0)
    Does it matter why a student can't attend school during the day? I think as long as the professionals and family involved decide this is what is needed it shouldn't matter to anyone else.

    Again it goes back to a standard policy for all Dedham students being implemented effectively.  That way no one has a gripe!

    Each student/situation may be unique but the school's response should be the same---if in home tutoring is needed than it is given during non-school hours for all students.


    [ Parent ]
    just noticed I spelled difference wrong ---oops! (0.00 / 0)


    [ Parent ]
    Couldn't Care Less (0.00 / 0)
    I couldn't care less about the reason either, my point was that whatever the reason was, the school department has probably reached the limit on any and all information they can release on this matter without breaching confidentiality ... which is what I meant when I said:

    I think ... that was part of my point.

    And really ... Dedham school officials don't have the discretion to determine what time of day is most efficient and effective to deploy resources for in-home services on a case-by-case basis? That sounds a lot more like micro-management than a quest for equity to me.


    [ Parent ]
    The question remains one of policy (0.00 / 0)
    They certainly don't have to nor should reveal any personal situations but all they have to say is when any student is determined to receive at home educational services provided by the school system our policy unilaterally is.....  

    Which I am sure would not include the hours the teacher is  assigned to a class!

    If it happened before, I think someone would have mentioned it as a precedent by now.


    [ Parent ]
    I Am Aware (0.00 / 0)
    Of at least one situation where teachers were assigned to a student's home during school hours. It was not controversial at that time, and just about everyone I know was also aware of the situation.

    This was made into an issue because of the potential conflict of interest in the current situation.  The time of day issue is much ado about nothing in and of itself. Its real function was to keep people upset at the incumbents until they were voted out.


    [ Parent ]
    You were aware???? (0.00 / 0)
    Steb,
    You were aware that this was happening and only now are saying so?  And others were, too?  If all these people who knew are parents of current students in the Dedham Public Schools, shame on you and on anyone else who knew and waited until now to say something about it.  Someone should have stepped up and questioned it as soon as they found out.

    You say the "time of day issue is much ado about nothing..."  What if one of your children went without his teacher for several weeks?  Would the time of day matter to you then?

    I think you aren't giving people enough credit.  It sounds like this was made into an issue not because people wanted to oust incumbents, but because it was affecting up to 24 students during the time their teachers were OUT of the building and not teaching their 8-12 students each, but tutoring one student instead.

    For shame.


    [ Parent ]
    Settle Down (0.00 / 0)
    The situation I'm referring to happened in a school year prior to current. Teachers were allocated during the school day and classrooms were covered. It was not a SPED teacher that was allocated, it was a medical situation. Nobody had to step up and say anything, because it was all done above board and most everyone and their mother knew what was happening. No kids were left without teachers and the schools did the right thing.

    So please, spare me the "shame on you" and the over the top, self-congratulatory moral superiority act. You must be a hoot at a dinner party.

    And yeah, the time of day issue is "much ado about nothing." It deserves to be discussed, even investigated, and steps should be taken to clarify how resources should be best allocated going forward. But turning it into a moral crusade and demanding heads to roll is a response disproportionate to the perceived offense.

    Some kid pushing my kid down on the playground demands a response ... shooting the other kid is a disproportionate reaction.  


    [ Parent ]

    HOME

    All content © 2010
    The Contentment Company

    Creative Commons License


    Event Calendar
    September 2010
    (view month)
    S M T W R F S
    * * * 01 02 03 04
    05 06 07 08 09 10 11
    12 13 14 15 16 17 18
    19 20 21 22 23 24 25
    26 27 28 29 30 * *
    << (add event) >>

    Poll
    Legacy Place has been around for a year now. How do you like it?
    Great! I go there all the time.
    Good. I'm glad we have it, but I don't go often.
    It's OK. Doesn't affect me one way or another.
    Bad. It's been a net-negative for the town.
    Terrible! I wish they never built it.

    Results

    Active Users
    Currently 0 user(s) logged on.


    Powered by: SoapBlox